(Message davew:1433)
Subj: Re: [L5RINFO] Rules debate, etc.
From: David Williams <l5r@TSTONRAMP.COM>

  To: L5RINFO@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2000 19:46:45 PDT
-- /blue/homes/cowell/Mail/mhl.format --

>I think I can add to this discussion in a simple manner.  Zen is looking for
>examples, although Vaughn and others have cited examples already, in my
>opinion.  No, I won't cite them.  But I will say this:
>
>Cards should not require rulings the moment the spoilers hit the Internet.
>They should be worded in such a way that the way they were intended to work
>is absolutely, 100% clear, else there should be a clarification in the set's
>accompanying rulebook.

There are closing in on THREE THOUSAND cards. Are you seriously
telling me that every card should work obviously, without question,
and incapable of being intentionaly misinterpreted (which is often
the situation on rules questions) with every other card? That's close
to nine MILLION two card combinations!

I'm sorry, but that's absolutely ridiculous.


----------------------------------------
David Williams
l5r@tstonramp.com
Lead Designer - Legend of the Five Rings CCG, Deadlands CCG
Alderac Entertainment Group

****************************************************************************

The L5R Home Page: http://www.wizards.com/L5R

To unsubscribe from this list send mail to listserv@oracle.wizards.com with
the line 'SIGNOFF L5RInfo' as the body of the message.

Contents (c)1999 Wizards of the Coast, Inc. All rights reserved.